Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Ãʱâ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ °üÇÑ °íÂû: ¼º°ß¿¡¼­ÀÇ ½ÇÇèÀû ¿¬±¸

Study of initial stability change of implant: an experimental study in the dog

Journal of Dental Implant Research 2013³â 32±Ç 2È£ p.33 ~ 39
±è¿µ°¢, ±è¼ºÅ¹, Çö±â, Ȳ¼®Çö, ±èÀ縸, ÁÖÃÑ, Àü»óÈ£, ÃÖ¿¬Á¶, ·ùÀçÁØ, ±ÇÁ¾Áø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±è¿µ°¢ ( Kim Young-kak ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±è¼ºÅ¹ ( Kim Sung-tak ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø
Çö±â ( Hyun Ki ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
Ȳ¼®Çö ( Hwang Suk-hyun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±èÀ縸 ( Kim Jae-man ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÁÖÃÑ ( Zhou Cong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ÀÓ»óÄ¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø
Àü»óÈ£ ( Jun Sang-Ho ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
ÃÖ¿¬Á¶ ( Choi Yeon-Jo ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç º¸Ã¶°ú
·ùÀçÁØ ( Ryu Jae-Jun ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç º¸Ã¶°ú
±ÇÁ¾Áø ( Kwon Jong-Jin ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of study was to analyze the initial stability change of N company A implant.

Materials and Methods: A total of 32 implant were placed in 4 mongrel dogs. Implant were divided into 2 groups following to manufacturer. Group 1 is consisted of 16 of A implant (N co., Seoul, Korea), and Group 2 is consisted of 16 of B implant (C co., Seoul, Korea). After implant placement, ITV (insertion torque value), ISQ (implant stability quotient), PTV (periotest value) were measured immediately, 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 16 weeks of healing period. With the animal¡¯s sacrifice 12 weeks after implant installation and histomorphometric analyses were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS for window (ver.20.0 SPSS Inc.). Statistical differences were considered significant at p£¼0.05.

Results: There was significant difference of ITV, ISQ, PTV between A implant and B implant at all of period (p£¼0.05). There was no significant difference of initial stability change of A implant (p£¾0.05). The percentage of direct bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone area ratio (BA) showed statistical significant between group 1 and 2 at 12 weeks (p£¼0.05).

Conclusions: These result indicate that A implant does not have stability dip. In conclusion, A implant allows immediate or early loading implant protocol.

Å°¿öµå

Implant; Initial stability; Stability dip; Immediate loading

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸